
doi: 10.1007/bf01195337
The group codes are ideals of group algebras. Let \(G\) and \(H\) be groups of the same order, \(F\) be a finite field, let \(FG\) and \(FH\) be the corresponding group rings. The combinatorial equivalence is an \(F\) vector space isomorphism \(\gamma: FG\to FH\) induced by a bijection \(\gamma: G\to H\). Codes \(C1 \subseteq FG\) and \(C2 \subseteq FH\) are said to be combinatorially equivalent if there exists a combinatorial equivalence \(\gamma: FG\to FH\) such that \(\gamma (C1)= C2\). In this paper the authors investigate the group codes when the underlying groups are metacyclic groups of odd order and \(F\) is a field of characteristic two. Using methods of representation theory it is shown that each of these codes is combinatorially equivalent to an abelian code, and therefore they are not interesting as non-abelian codes. Certain of them contain one-sided (which are one-sided ideals) non- abelian codes which are not combinatorially equivalent and may vary in minimal distance. There are also given examples, a list of the better metacyclic codes and the algorithm to determine minimal left metacyclic codes.
Bounds on codes, combinatorial equivalence, metacyclic groups of odd order, metacyclic codes, error-correcting codes, algebraic codes, non-abelian codes, group codes, Cyclic codes, Linear algebraic groups over arbitrary fields
Bounds on codes, combinatorial equivalence, metacyclic groups of odd order, metacyclic codes, error-correcting codes, algebraic codes, non-abelian codes, group codes, Cyclic codes, Linear algebraic groups over arbitrary fields
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
