
doi: 10.1007/bf01101897
One purpose of many regression studies is to compare the relative importance of the independent variables. Several different measures have been used to measure importance:t-values, standardized regression coefficients, elasticity, commonality analysis, increment inR2, correlation coefficients, hierarchical partitioning etc. Some of these measures have the common feature of partitioningR2 between the independent variables and assess their importance according to their contribution toR2. This paper is an attempt to clarify the advantages and disadvantages with these different methods and find out if any useful information can be gained by a partitioning ofR2.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
