
doi: 10.1007/bf01058392
The recognition of the importance of paraconsistency for the study of the problem of modelling and automatizing the reasoning required to produce a glimmer of intelligent behavior on machines appeared in several previous works of the authors. This paper presents a proof method for automation of reasoning in the known paraconsistent predicate calculus \(C^*_ 1\) of da Costa. The method is analytical, using a specially designed tableau system. The reasoning method presented here is a tableau system sound and complete for \(C^*_ 1\), actually two tableau systems being developed. The system \(SC^*_ 1\) is presented with sketches for the proofs of its soundness and completeness with respect to the semantics of \(C^*_ 1\), being not suitable, meanwhile, for implementation. The system \(S'C^*_ 1\), a conservative extension of \(SC^*_ 1\) designed to enable better implementation, is then described. It has more rules, which prove to produce smaller trees than those resulting from the applications of the rules in \(SC^*_ 1\). The two systems are equivalent in the sense that they are able to prove the same theorems. A prototype based on \(S'C^*_ 1\) was effectively implemented and the authors suggest its improvement as a prover.
Mechanization of proofs and logical operations, automation of reasoning, Paraconsistent logics, completeness, paraconsistency, soundness, implementation, paraconsistent predicate calculus \(C^*_ 1\), tableau system
Mechanization of proofs and logical operations, automation of reasoning, Paraconsistent logics, completeness, paraconsistency, soundness, implementation, paraconsistent predicate calculus \(C^*_ 1\), tableau system
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
