
doi: 10.1007/bf00998622
pmid: 348240
The evidence regarding specific cardiac perception and discrimination, and its relationship to voluntary cardiac control, is critically reviewed. Studies are considered in three sections, depending on the method used to assess cardiac perception: questionnaire assessment, discrimination procedures, and heartbeat tracking. The heartbeat tracking procedure would appear to suffer least from interpretative difficulties. Recommendations are made regarding the style of analysis used to assess heartbeat perception in such tracking tasks.
Discrimination, Psychological, Heart Rate, Research Design, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Biofeedback, Psychology, Perception, Autonomic Nervous System, Internal-External Control
Discrimination, Psychological, Heart Rate, Research Design, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Biofeedback, Psychology, Perception, Autonomic Nervous System, Internal-External Control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
