
doi: 10.1007/bf00985253
pmid: 9385093
In some problems in survival analysis there may be more than one plausible measure of time for each individual. For example mileage may be a better indication of the age of a car than months. This paper considers the possibility of combining two (or more) time scales measured on each individual into a single scale. A collapsibility condition is proposed for regarding the combined scale as fully informative regarding survival. The resulting model may be regarded as a generalization of the usual accelerated life model that allows time-dependent covariates. Parametric methods for the choice of time scale, for testing the validity of the collapsibility assumption and for parametric inference about the failure distribution along the new scale are discussed. Two examples are used to illustrate the methods, namely Hyde's (1980) Channing House data and a large cohort mortality study of asbestos workers in Quebec.
bivariate hazard function, Male, Lung Neoplasms, Time Factors, collapsibility condition, choice of time scale, California, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, survival analysis, Life Expectancy, equivalency, accelerated life model, Humans, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Likelihood Functions, Reliability and life testing, Models, Statistical, aging, Quebec, Survival Analysis, time-dependent covariates, Female
bivariate hazard function, Male, Lung Neoplasms, Time Factors, collapsibility condition, choice of time scale, California, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, survival analysis, Life Expectancy, equivalency, accelerated life model, Humans, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Likelihood Functions, Reliability and life testing, Models, Statistical, aging, Quebec, Survival Analysis, time-dependent covariates, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
