
doi: 10.1007/bf00971111
It has been proved in our earlier papers [Algebra Logika 28, No. 5, 597- 607 (1989; Zbl 0708.08005); Sib. Mat. Zh. 31, No. 3, 125-134 (1990; Zbl 0712.08008)] that 1) if \({\mathfrak M}\) is a discriminator variety that is not finitely generated, then \(\langle {\mathfrak {JM}}_{\aleph_ 0};\ll\rangle\), its countable epimorphism skeleton, contains an uncountable set of pairwise incomparable elements, and if \({\mathfrak M}\) is of finite signature or all \({\mathfrak M}\)-algebras contain one-element subalgebras, then each countable quasiorder can be isomorphically embedded in \(\langle {\mathfrak {JM}}_{\aleph_ 0};\ll\rangle\); 2) if \({\mathfrak M}\) is a discriminator variety of finite signature that is not locally finite, then each countable partially ordered set can be isomorphically embedded in \(\langle {\mathfrak {JM}}_{\aleph_ 0}; \leq\rangle\), its countable embeddability skeleton. In the same articles we have put forward the conjecture that in the case of finitely generated discriminator varieties \({\mathfrak M}\) both the countable skeletons \(\langle {\mathfrak {JM}}_{\aleph_ 0}; \ll\rangle\) and \(\langle {\mathfrak {JM}}_{\aleph_ 0}; \leq\rangle\) are totally quasiordered, i.e., each set of their incomparable elements is finite, and each strictly decreasing chain terminates. The present article is devoted to a proof of these statements.
partially ordered set, countable epimorphism skeleton, finitely generated discriminator varieties, strictly decreasing chain, Partial orders, general, countable embeddability skeleton, Varieties, incomparable elements, quasiorder
partially ordered set, countable epimorphism skeleton, finitely generated discriminator varieties, strictly decreasing chain, Partial orders, general, countable embeddability skeleton, Varieties, incomparable elements, quasiorder
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
