
doi: 10.1007/bf00941319
handle: 11385/6913
The concept of \(\beta\)-dominance proposed by \textit{C. Wrather} and \textit{P. L. Yu} [ibid. 36, 315-334 (1982; Zbl 0452.90007)] is shown to be not equivalent to that of expected utilities, which depend on the chosen alternative and the not chosen alternative.
probability dominance, beta dominance, Expected utility, expected utilities, regret, [SHS.ECO.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance/domain_shs.eco.eco, Utility theory
probability dominance, beta dominance, Expected utility, expected utilities, regret, [SHS.ECO.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance/domain_shs.eco.eco, Utility theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
