A comparative assessment of the cost of iron powders produced by the melt atomization method and by dual reduction of rolling mill scale

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Feb 1978 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Soviet Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics, volume 17, pages 147-150 (issn: 0038-5735, eissn: 1573-9066,

Copyright policy )

Authors: �. Ya. Popichenko; A. G. Bol'shechenko;

doi: 10.1007/bf00796349

A comparative assessment of the cost of iron powders produced by the melt atomization method and by dual reduction of rolling mill scale

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

1. The cost of iron powder produced by the atomization process is higher than that of iron powder produced by the dual reduction process. This is due to the higher cost of the starting material used, which represents 50% of the total cost of 1 ton of iron powder. 2. Since, however, iron powder produced by dual reduction from a briquetted charge must be additionally annealed, its true cost rises and exceeds the cost of atomized powder by 72.60 rubles per ton (at annual outputs of 15,000 and 25,000 tons, respectively).

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average