
doi: 10.1007/bf00632460
The paper starts with an ill-defined grammatical distinction between ``arguments'' and ``adjuncts'', opposing both to ``implicit arguments''. These are not defined at all, though examples make it patent that what is meant are adverbial phrases like ``by Felix'' in the sentence ``John was seen by Felix''. We learn that ``rather they are phrases licensed by a form of extra-grammatical `inference' involving knowledge about events and the relationships holding among them''. And the paper goes on in this ``rather''-way for 30 pages, coded in muddy symbolism.
situation semantics, adverbial phrases, Logic of natural languages
situation semantics, adverbial phrases, Logic of natural languages
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
