
handle: 11245/1.419340 , 11245/1.246406
Abstract This paper is devoted to the formulation and investigation of a dynamic semantic interpretation of the language of first-order predicate logic. The resulting system, which will be referred to as “dynamic predicate logic,” is intended as a first step toward a compositional, non-representational theory of discourse semantics. In the last decade, various theories of discourse semantics have emerged within the para-digm of model-theoretic semantics. A common feature of these theories is a tendency to do away with the principle of compositionality, a principle which, implicitly or explicitly, has dominated semantics since the days of Frege. Therefore the question naturally arises whether non-compositionality is in any way a necessary feature of discourse semantics.
Logic in computer science, dynamic logic, Logic of natural languages, dynamic interpretation, discourse representation, scope, anaphora, semantics for first-order predicate formulas
Logic in computer science, dynamic logic, Logic of natural languages, dynamic interpretation, discourse representation, scope, anaphora, semantics for first-order predicate formulas
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 589 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
