
doi: 10.1007/bf00489650
pmid: 2609283
Only recently have ethicists been invited into the clinical setting to offer recommendations about patient care decisions. This paper discusses this new role for ethicists from the perspective of content and process issues. Among content issues are the usual ethical dilemmas such as the aggressiveness of treatment, questions about consent, and alternative treatment options. Among process issues are those that relate to communication with the patient. The formal ethics consult is discussed, the steps taken in such a consult, and whether there should be a fee charged. We conclude with an examination of the risks and benefits of formal ethics consults.
Patient Care Team, Ethicists, Fee Schedules, Ethics Consultation, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Interdisciplinary Communication, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Referral and Consultation, Risk Assessment, Social Control, Formal
Patient Care Team, Ethicists, Fee Schedules, Ethics Consultation, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Interdisciplinary Communication, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Referral and Consultation, Risk Assessment, Social Control, Formal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
