Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archives of Microbio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Archives of Microbiology
Article . 1987 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Viability of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteriods

Authors: T. R. McDermott; P. H. Graham; D. H. Brandwein;

Viability of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteriods

Abstract

Homogenates from soybean nodules, formed by 12 strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, were plated into yeast-extract mannitol agar containing 3 or 37 g mannitol 1-1. Viable counts ranged from 8.298 to 11.265 log10 cells-gram nodule-1. When monitored over the life cycle of the symbiosis, the viability of strains USDA 110 and USDA 123 increased with days after planting (DAP), and at 70 DAP was 95% and 81%, respectively. By contrast, the viability of USDA 38 bacteroids decreased with time, and at 70 DAP was only 1.9%. At 49 DAP, nodules induced by USDA 38 had significantly fewer bacteroids per peribacteroid membrane than those formed by USDA 110 or USDA 123, and at 70 DAP, 27% of the USDA 38 bacteroids showed some degree of degeneration. Viable counts of USDA 123 and USDA 110 bacteroids, isolated from the nodules of 12 different cultivars, ranged from 10.963 to 11.463 and from 10.683 to 11.117 log10 viable cells-gram nodule-1, respectively. Varying the osmolarity of the medium had no predictable effect on bacteroid viability. When surface-sterilized nodules of IPAGO 587 (high bacteroid viability) and USDA 38 (low bacteroid viability) were inoculated into a nonsterile silt loam soil, at rates equivalent to 5.0×108 and 5.0×106 viable bacteroids g-1 soil, respectively, and then incubated at 28° C for 60 days, 4.3×104 and 1.5×104 surviving cells g-1 soil, respectively, were recovered. Thus, despite differences due to host and strain variation, bacteroid viability appears to be unrelated to persistence of individual strains following an annual legume crop cycle.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!