Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Oecologiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Oecologia
Article . 1987 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Dry matter partitioning and root length/leaf area ratios in herbaceous perennial plants with diverse altitudinal distribution

Authors: Ch, Körner; U, Renhardt;

Dry matter partitioning and root length/leaf area ratios in herbaceous perennial plants with diverse altitudinal distribution

Abstract

Partitioning patterns in 22 exclusively low and 27 exclusively high altitude perennial herbaceous species were examined in order to test the hypothesis that plants of high altitudes allocate more dry matter to below-ground parts and in particular to storage organs, than typical low altitude plants. Our results raise some doubts about the general validity of this hypothesis. The mean fractions of total dry matter allocated to green leaves (22±2% s.e. at low and 24±2% at high altitude) and special storage organs (28±4% at both altitudes) do not differ significantly among sites. The mean relative portions of total dry matter allocated to above-ground plant parts amount to 57±3% at low and 42±3% at high elevation (P=0.002) and differ less than often assumed. The greater below-ground fraction at high altitude results from reduced stem and proportionally increased fine root compartments. At high altitude specific root length is increased by 50% and mean individual rooting density is tripled. Fine root length per unit leaf area is 4.5 times greater (P<0.001). However, interspecific variation in all these quantities is considerable and species with quite contrasting partitioning patterns coexist at both elevations. This suggests that the success of perennial herbaceous plants at high elevations does not necessarily depend on a large below ground biomass fraction. The increased fine root length at high altitude may substitute for reduced mycorrhizal infection. Figure 1 provides a graphical summary.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    144
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
144
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!