
It is first shown that den Boer's (1985) claims that competition should be rejected as a factor explaining community structure are not warranted by his tests on temporal niche differentiation in carabid beetles. The power of these tests is so low that they are unlikely to detect even the most extreme pattern of niche differentiation. A major factor that affects their power is the procedure of building up an artificial species pool from the local communities to which the test is to be applied. Alternative tests are then presented, and applied to data on annual activity cycles of carabids in three forest biotopes in Belgium. Three factors are shown to strongly affect their outcome: the unit into which the time scale is divided, the criteria used to incorporate constraints, and the set of species selected. Nevertheless, they provide some evidence that there is a growing niche differentiation from the successional to the climax forest, as predicted by competition theory. Other hypotheses, however, could explain the observed pattern.
Niche differentiation, Carabid beetles, Ecologie, Phenology, Evolution des espèces, competition, Statistical inference
Niche differentiation, Carabid beetles, Ecologie, Phenology, Evolution des espèces, competition, Statistical inference
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
