
doi: 10.1007/bf00370288
This paper explores conditions under which necessity, Lp, can be defined in terms of non-contingency, \(\Delta\) p (where \(\Delta\) \(p\equiv Lp\vee L\sim p\) must always be true). For systems containing T a defnition is easy, viz. \(L\alpha\) \(=_{df}\alpha \&\Delta \alpha\), because of the axiom Lp\(\supset p\). Necessity is also easily defined in the verum system \(=K+Lp,\) since \(\vdash_{Ver} Lp\equiv (p\supset p)\). In most other systems not containing T, necessity is not definable in terms of non- contingency. Nevertheless, there is at least one in which it is, namely \(S=K+Lp\equiv (\Delta p\&(p\equiv \Delta \Delta p)).\)
necessity, non-contingency, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), modal logic
necessity, non-contingency, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), modal logic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
