
doi: 10.1007/bf00344924
pmid: 28308169
When several species co-exist, the amount by which they overlap in their use of resources is a measure of their similarity to one another. As such, resource overlap does not measure the amount of competition among them. When the resources are not limiting to population growth, patterns of resource use may overlap to any degree. However, when the species are frequently in competition for their resources, natural selection will favor the separation of their requirements, and the amount of resource overlap will be reduced.This paper presents a technique which permits comparison of the amount of resource overlap observed in a given case with that expected for a group of similar species co-existing in the absence of competitive interactions. From this comparison can be evaluated the likelihood of competitive processes being important in the situation under study.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 103 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
