
doi: 10.1007/bf00336002
Potentially mineralizable soil N was determined after incubation for 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 22, and 30 weeks, according to the Stanford and Smith method. A first-order kinetics model was used, and a simulation study was performed using three different statistical methods to estimate potentially mineralizable N and the rate constant k. The first method was based on the maximum-likelihood approach. The second one relied on nonlinear least square data fitting. The third method was based on linear of logarithmically transformed data. The results of the simulation study suggested that the non-linear least square method was preferable to the others. This method was then applied to real data from 30 different Italian soils. The values obtained for potentially mineralizable N were, on average, 10% of total N (mean standard error=0.9). The estimated value of k was 0.050 (mean standard error=0.005). Finally, from the values obtained for k and the results of the simulation, the results indicated that significantly less reliable estimates of potentially mineralizable N were obtained by using data for up to only 22 weeks of incubation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
