
doi: 10.1007/bf00317700
pmid: 28313530
In common with samples from less taxonomically constrained studies, significant correlations exist between the numbers of predatory and non-predatory species in assemblages of terrestrial beetles. Under logarithmic transformation the relationship can be described reasonably well by a straight line. Explanations for predator: non-predator relationships based on the dynamics of trophic interactions (e.g. competition for prey types or enemy-free space) seem insufficient to explain this pattern, because within beetle assemblages the necessary interactions are so few. Of other proposed determinants, those based on the relationship of local and regional species pools, on energetics, or on non-trophic factors seem the most plausible candidates for explaining proportionality amongst beetles. Much of the deviation from the overall pattern can be accounted for by sampling method and latitude. Temperate samples have a higher proportion of predatory species than tropical, whilst litter and pitfall trap samples have higher proportions of predatory species than Malaise trap and fogging samples.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
