Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Oecologiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Oecologia
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Photosynthetic induction times in shade-tolerant species with long and short-lived leaves

Authors: Thomas A, Kursar; Phyllis D, Coley;

Photosynthetic induction times in shade-tolerant species with long and short-lived leaves

Abstract

In the understory of a tropical rainforest, light flecks can contribute 10-80% of the total light flux. We investigated the capacity of eight shade-tolerant species to use light flecks by examining the time required for full induction of photosynthesis during an artificial light fleck. CO2 fixation rates were measured with a portable LiCor gas-exchange system for plants growing in the field on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. In all species induction to 50% of maximum CO2 fixation occurred quickly, from 1 to 3 min. In species with short leaf lifetimes (1 year), induction to 90% of maximum also occurred quickly, in 3-6 min. In contrast, the species with longer lived leaves (>4 years) required 11-36 min for induction to 90% of maximum. Induction times for leaves from gap and understory plants of the same species were indistinguishable. Elevated CO2 did not eliminate the slow induction phase of long-lived leaves. This suggests that slow induction did not result from stomatal limitation. O2 evolution, measured on excised leaf disks, induced in 3-4 min in species with short-lived leaves, and 4-8 min in species with long-lived leaves. The rapid induction of O2 evolution indicates that the slower induction of CO2 fixation in long-lived leaves was not caused by a delay in the induction of electron transport. Activation of rubisco may be the major factor limiting response times in species with long-lived leaves. Species from Panama with short-lived leaves had remarkably rapid induction times that are comparable to those of algae or higher plant chloroplasts. We also found that understory forest plants induced two to seven times more quickly than did potted plants.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    51
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
51
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!