
doi: 10.1007/bf00260931
The Gödel-Tarski translation of the intuitionistic predicate logic into S4 by prefixing \(\square\) to all subformulas is sound and faithful. The author proves a similar result for translations of the intuitionistic versions of linear logic, relevance logic and BCK-logic into their classical S4-analogs. The proof uses analysis of cut-free Gentzen-type derivations.
Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics), linear logic, translations of intuitionistic logics into modal logics, BCK-logic, Cut-elimination and normal-form theorems, analysis of cut-free Gentzen-type derivations, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), Subsystems of classical logic (including intuitionistic logic), relevance logic
Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics), linear logic, translations of intuitionistic logics into modal logics, BCK-logic, Cut-elimination and normal-form theorems, analysis of cut-free Gentzen-type derivations, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), Subsystems of classical logic (including intuitionistic logic), relevance logic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
