Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Coral Reefsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Coral Reefs
Article . 1990 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Bias in manta tow surveys of Acanthaster planci

Authors: L. Fernandes; H. Marsh; P. J. Moran; D. Sinclair;

Bias in manta tow surveys of Acanthaster planci

Abstract

To investigate the biases associated with manta tow surveys of Acanthaster planci, counts obtained by manta-towed observers were compared with counts made on SCUBA swims under a limited range of conditions. Five 10 m wide strip transects on different parts of two reefs and with different densities of A. planci were surveyed. On average, 22.7% of starfish counted on SCUBA searches were counted on manta tows over the same transect (SD=12.0%, n=69). This proportion is termed sightability. As sightability decreases with increasing transect width, we estimate that, on average, less than 5% of the A. planci present are counted on routine manta tows which are conducted over transect of undefined width. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine which of 33 variables explained most of the variation in sightability in 10 m wide transects. The most influential variables were the proportion of cryptic starfish and an index of the degree of reef complexity. A regression equation designed to improve estimates of the abundance of A. planci on routine manta tows was developed. However, as it explained only 39% of the variation in sightability, this equation is of limited value in stabilising the negative bias associated with manta tow counts. In view of the variability of this bias, the manta tow technique is not suitable for estimating absolute densities of A. planci. Manta tow surveys are appropriate for identifying gross relative differences between densities of A. planci, and thus for determining broad-scale patterns of abundance. As such, they are a cost-effective method of estimating the geographical extent of A. planci outbreaks.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!