
doi: 10.1007/bf00249039
"American Jewish Culture," considered merely as a phrase, is as problematic say as "Freudian Literary Criticism," which I recall once comparing to the Holy Roman Empire: not holy, not Roman, not an empire; not Freudian, not literary, not criticism. Much that is herded together under the rubric of Ameri? can Jewish Culture is not American, not Jewish, not culture. Here I will take these terms back? wards, starting with "culture," which began as a Roman concept, became European, has not quite yet become American, and never could be Jewish, if by Jewish we mean anything reli? gious at all, since culture is a stubbornly secular concept. Whether we know what we mean by "Jewish" is so problematic that I will begin on "culture" with one of our enemies, since our enemies have known well enough what they meant. I will quote an eminent speculator upon culture, Carl Gustav Jung. Of course, he has his followers and apologists, but I will let him speak for himself, in an essay of 1934:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
