
doi: 10.1007/bf00248636
The central point of the combinatorial possible worlds theory is to develop a concept of a possible world as a possible combination of universals and individuals. In such a context one of the main problems is to distinguish two basic sorts of combinations: the possible ones and the impossible ones. In this paper, the author gives an explication of accessibility and similarity of possible worlds and shows that structural constraints flow directly from the conceptual structure of the actual world. The definition of a natural structural accessibility relation for combinatorial worlds is presented and its basic formal properties are considered.
Logic of natural languages, possible worlds, Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), similarity, combinatorial worlds, accessibility
Logic of natural languages, possible worlds, Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), similarity, combinatorial worlds, accessibility
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
