
doi: 10.1007/bf00229660
pmid: 8405243
Human subjects pointed, without seeing their arm, at visual targets presented in repeated sequences in a frontal plane. Required movement direction could change within the sequence by 0, 45, 90, 135 or 180 degrees. Hand position was recorded contact-free in three dimensions (3D). From the recordings, the pointing errors towards each target were transformed into a Cartesian coordinate system with the x-axis representing the mean direction of all movements towards that target. We then investigated the relationship between successive errors by applying linear regression analysis separately to the three Cartesian error components. For the x-component, we found that successive errors were positively correlated throughout the experiment, which confirms our previous finding that errors in sequential pointing tend to accumulate (Bock and Eckmiller 1986; Bock et al. 1990). Correlation dropped by nearly 50% following a direction change of 90 degrees or more, suggesting that accumulation is reduced but not abolished by large changes in movement direction. The slope of the regression line averaged 0.6, which indicates the existence of a complementary trend towards error correction, contributing about 40% towards motor performance. Changes of movement direction affected slope and correlation in a closely similar way, suggesting that reduced accumulation is paralleled by increased correction. For the y- and z-components, we found that successive errors were positively correlated as well, but were not reduced following even large direction changes. This apparent discrepancy can be resolved by assuming separate neural mechanisms for amplitude and for direction control, differing in their sensitivity to direction changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Analysis of Variance, Movement, Arm, Visual Perception, Animals, Humans, Hominidae, Proprioception, Psychomotor Performance
Analysis of Variance, Movement, Arm, Visual Perception, Animals, Humans, Hominidae, Proprioception, Psychomotor Performance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
