Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Theoretical and Appl...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Article . 1991 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Efficiency of potato breeding using FDR 2n gametes for multitrait selection and progeny testing

Authors: R, Ortiz; S J, Peloquin; R, Freyre; M, Iwanaga;

Efficiency of potato breeding using FDR 2n gametes for multitrait selection and progeny testing

Abstract

The objective of this research was to compare the efficiency of the 4x×2x breeding scheme with the traditional 4x×4x method with respect to potato improvement. The basis for such a comparison was the parental value of four 2x and four 4x male parents from the International Potato Center (CIP) as measured by multitrait selection and progeny testing. The 2x parents produced 2n pollen by parallel spindles at anaphase II, which is genetically equivalent to a first division restitution (FDR) mechanism. Both 2x and 4x parents were crossed with four common 4x female parents. Thus, 32 families were evaluated over 2 years at four Peruvian locations. A selection index which considered tuber yield, tuber number, average tuber weight and specific gravity was used for multitrait selection. Three FDR 2x parents had better selection index scores than the 4x parents over the four locations. Estimates of broad-sense heritability for total yield using different number of replications and locations were calculated by using the variance components. The 4x × 2x breeding scheme was found to be better than the traditional 4x × 4x method since fewer replications and locations are required to evaluate tuber yield in 4x × 2x progenies than in 4x × 4x progenies. The FDR 2x parents were also better material than the 4x parents for testing combining ability for tuber yield of the 4x progenitors. This could be the result of the mode of FDR 2n pollen formation. The pollen of FDR 2x parents is more heterozygous, but more homogenous than n pollen from 4x parents.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!