
doi: 10.1007/bf00155296
We discuss Ulmschneider's claim to have established that the short-period acoustic wave energy input is the only one able to balance the chromospheric radiation loss. We first review the range of uncertainty in empirical and radiative equilibrium models, on which estimates of the excess radiation coming from mechanical heating rest. We then show that Ulmschneider's estimate of this excess radiation from such models uses an over-simplified computational method. The resultant of uncertainty in models and in computational methods suggests that Ulmschneider's results on excess radiation from heating in the low chromosphere is subject to overestimation by an order of magnitude.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
