Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Plant and Soilarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Plant and Soil
Article . 1977 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Efficiency of zinc fertilization for flooded rice

Authors: P. M. Giordano;

Efficiency of zinc fertilization for flooded rice

Abstract

Several Zn-deficient soils from the major rice growing areas in the USA were characterized with respect to extractable and labile Zn and other parameters including available P, pH, organic matter, and cation exchange capacity. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine whether the above factors influence the response of several rice cultivars to ZnSO4 or ZnEDTA applied as a mixed preplant treatment or to the floodwater at panicle initiation. Response of the rice to Zn varied widely among soils with labile Zn (L value) being a poor indicator of Zn availability and soil pH, and DTPA or 2 N MgCl2 extraction of Zn being the most reliable indices. Soil incorporation prior to flooding was more effective than floodwater application for the initial crop, but both methods of placement were comparable for a subsequent ratoon crop. In either situation, ZnSO4 was superior to ZnEDTA. Recovery of Zn from ZnSO4 was generally less than 5 percent where Zn response was obtained and up to 14 percent from nonresponsive soils.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!