
doi: 10.1007/bf00127310
pmid: 9384633
We propose to use a general mixing distribution in modeling the heterogeneity of the fecundability of couples. We introduce a sequence of parameters called canonical moments, which is in one to one correspondence with the moments, to characterize the mixing distribution. By using the bootstrap method, we can estimate the standard errors of our estimates. Our method modifies the usual moment estimates so that the resulting mixing distribution is always supported on [0, 1]. Moreover, the downward bias of the moment estimate of the number of support points would be reduced. Our approach can be used for censored data. The application of our technique in finding the sterile subpopulation is also discussed. The theory is illustrated with several data examples and simulations.
fecundability, Male, Biometry, mixture of geometric distributions, Models, Biological, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Fertility, bootstrap estimates, Pregnancy, canonical moments, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Infertility, Humans, Kaplan-Meier estimates, Female, Life Tables, heterogeneity, Nonparametric estimation
fecundability, Male, Biometry, mixture of geometric distributions, Models, Biological, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Fertility, bootstrap estimates, Pregnancy, canonical moments, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Infertility, Humans, Kaplan-Meier estimates, Female, Life Tables, heterogeneity, Nonparametric estimation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
