Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Public Choicearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Public Choice
Article . 1979 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Social welfare functions when preferences are convex, strictly monotonic, and continuous

Authors: Ehud Kalai; Eitan Muller; Mark A. Satterthwaite;

Social welfare functions when preferences are convex, strictly monotonic, and continuous

Abstract

The paper shows that if the class of admissible preference orderings is restricted in a manner appropriate for economic and political models, then Arrow's impossibility theorem for social welfare functions continues to be valid. Specifically if the space of alternatives is R n, n > 3, where each dimension represents a different public good and if each person's preferences are restricted to be convex, continuous, and strictly monotonic, then no social welfare function exists that satisfies unanimity, independence of irrelevant alternatives, and nondictatorship. Arrow (1963) proved that for a set of at least three alternatives no nondictatorial social welfare function (SWF) exists satisfying unanimity (U) and independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA), provided admissible preferences are not a priori restricted in some manner. If, however, the variety of preference orderings that are admissible is restricted sufficiently, then nondictatorial SWFs do exist that satisfy U and IIA. Single-peakedness, which Black (1948) discovered and Arrow (pp. 75-80) discussed, is the best known of these restrictions that is sufficient to make majority rule into a nondictatorial transitive SWF satisfying U and IIA. Papers of Inada (1969) and of Sen and Pattanaik (1969) generalized single-peakedness determined necessary and sufficient restrictions on the set of admissible preferences for majority rule to be a transitive SWF satisfying Arrow's conditions. Kramer (1973) used these results to show that majority rule is a valid Arrow type SWF only if the set of admissible preferences is restricted to a class that is much smaller than is justifiable by economic or political theory. These results describe the properties only of majority rule. The power of Arrow's theorem is that it rules out construction of any nondictatorial SWF satisfying U and IIA, not just social welfare functions based on majority rule. Our purpose in this paper is to show that the negative conclusions derived for the special case of majority rule generalize into true impossi

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    58
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
58
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!