
doi: 10.1007/bf00123416
In three recent articles (Smith, 1987, 1988, 1989) Pericles was investigated in the context of devising a new method for determining authorship. The play was divided in accordance with general scholarly opinion: Acts I and II and Acts III, IV and V were tested separately against Shakespeare vs. Chapman (C), Jonson (J), Middleton (M), Tourneur (T), Webster (w) and Wilkins (W), in turn. Acts III-V were confirmed as more akin to Shakespeare than any of the other authors, while
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
