
doi: 10.1007/bf00115637
pmid: 8850434
Epidemiologic evidence on the relation between nutrition and stomach cancer is reviewed. Stomach cancer shows a distinct international variation and dramatic worldwide decline. These descriptive features suggest that dietary factors are important in determining the risk of stomach cancer. The authors assessed relevant data regarding specific dietary hypotheses in the etiology of stomach cancer. A negative association with fresh vegetables and fruits is highly consistent in numerous case-control studies in different populations. Both epidemiologic and experimental data suggest that vitamins C and carotenoids lower risk of stomach cancer. Evidence is sparse and inconsistent as to protective effects of vitamin E and selenium. Epidemiologic studies have not lent, and will not provide, supportive evidence for an etiologic role of nitrate intake. High salt intake has been associated with an increased risk in many case-control studies and limited cohort studies. Taken together with animal data, it is considered that high salt intake is a risk factor for stomach cancer. Both epidemiologic and experimental data are inconclusive as to whether high-starch diets confer an increased risk. Cohort studies using quantitative dietary assessment and biologic measurement of micronutrients are needed for further understanding of etiologic roles of dietary factors in the causation of stomach cancer.
Nitrates, Starch, Ascorbic Acid, Carotenoids, Diet, Causality, Cohort Studies, Selenium, Nutrition Assessment, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Fruit, Vegetables, Animals, Humans, Vitamin E, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Sodium Chloride, Dietary
Nitrates, Starch, Ascorbic Acid, Carotenoids, Diet, Causality, Cohort Studies, Selenium, Nutrition Assessment, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Fruit, Vegetables, Animals, Humans, Vitamin E, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Sodium Chloride, Dietary
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 192 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
