
doi: 10.1007/bf00012859
The root systems of apple trees from five orchards ranging in age from 1.5-y to 14-y were sampled to depths of between one and two metres using soil cores. Although trees came from orchards which differed in soil-type, tree spacings and management, consistent patterns were found in root systems. In orchards of 4-y and older, roots of adjacent trees met so that soil volumes within the planting grids (i.e, tree spacings of approximately 5 m inter-row×4 m intra-row distances) were completely explored, although not completely occupied by roots. Mean root-length densities declined with depth for these orchards. In the 1.5-y orchard, roots from adjacent trees did not meet and root-length densities declined with radial distance from the stem as well as with depth. Root-length densities in the top 1 m ranged from zero to about 1.0 cm.cm−3 in all orchards and were highly variable. The proportions of core samples having zero values for root-length density were used to subdivide the root zone into volumes in which all samples contained roots, and volumes in which some samples had no roots. Results suggest that roots in an ‘average’ tree penetrate to at least one metre depth in all but very young orchards so that soil in this volume is fully explored. Volumes filled by roots and volumes occupied at any particular root-length density appear to reach a maximum at about 4 years. Volumes of soil occupied at any particular root-length density were equal in all orchards older than 4 years. This suggests that root growth was balanced by root death. In contrast woody roots continue to accumulate with time.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
