
In the preceding chapter, I suggested that the equal-opportunity argument in favour of hate-speech restrictions and pornography bans fails because banning hate speech and pornography does not improve communicative opportunities for vilified racial minorities or women. This was because, contrary to the “silencing” argument, the very presence of hate speech in society did not remove the communicative opportunities from the victims of such hate speech, even if it adversely affected their other important interests and goods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
