Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Assessing Antiprotozoal Agents

Authors: C. Jamie Newbold;

Assessing Antiprotozoal Agents

Abstract

Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen affects both the efficiency of ruminant production and the environmental impact of excreta from ruminant livestock production. Inefficient N retention by rumen microorganisms is compensated in production terms by feeding excessive amounts of dietary protein to the animal to meet required output levels. This leads directly to the excretion of N-rich wastes. Microbial protein synthesis in the rumen is the major source of amino acids entering the small intestine and available for absorption in ruminants [1, 4]. However, microbial protein turnover in the rumen may result in the net microbial protein outflow being less than half the total protein synthesised [9]. In vitro studies suggest that engulfment and digestion of bacteria by protozoa is by far the most important cause of microbial protein turnover in the rumen, with autolysis, other lytic factors and endogenous proteolysis being of minor importance [11]. Thus, it is apparent that removing ciliate protozoa from the rumen (defaunating) should avoid the recycling of nitrogen between bacteria and protozoa and thereby increase the efficiency of nitrogen metabolism in the rumen and stimulate the flow of microbial protein from the rumen [12]. A variety of techniques to remove protozoa from the rumen has been tested experimentally, but none is used routinely, because of toxicity problems, either to the rest of the rumen microbial population or to the host animal [12]. Recently, there has been an increased interest in plant secondary metabolites for use as possible defaunating agents. Here we describe three methods for screening plant material for antiprotozoal activity.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!