
The history, TNM categories, stage grouping, and related categorizations are compared between the TNM/AJCC stage classifications and the JES stage classification—Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. The most commonly used staging system throughout the world is the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours which is published collaboratively by the UICC and the AJCC. On the other hand, the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer is used throughout Japan and rarely in other countries. There is a large difference between the UICC/AJCC Classifications and the JES Classification in the definition of the esophagogastric junction for adenocarcinoma and in the N categories. The esophagogastric junction is defined based on Siewert’s Classification in the UICC/AJCC Classifications, while it is defined based on the Nishi’s Classification in the Japanese Classification. The N categories are classified by the number of metastasis-positive lymph nodes in the UICC/AJCC Classification, whereas they are classified by the spread of metastasis-positive lymph nodes in the JES Classification. The UICC/AJCC consider that stage classification should be based on prognostic outcomes only, while the JES consider that stage classification should be based on clinical prognostic outcomes and additionally should play a role in the guidelines for lymphadenectomy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
