Found an issue? Give us feedback

https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...

Part of book or chapter of book . 1992 . Peer-reviewed

Data sources: Crossref

https://link.springer.com/cont...

Other literature type

Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph

Select content type to embed

All Research products

arrow_drop_down

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Sensitivity Analysis with BEM

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type 01 Jan 1992 Germany Publisher:Springer Vienna

Authors: Schnack, Eckart; Iancu, Gabriela;

doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-2788-9_21

Sensitivity Analysis with BEM

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Shape optimization with the Boundary Element Method, see [01,02,04,08,09] has great advantages compared to the Finite Element Method based shape optimization. For linear problems, we have to discretize only the surface of the body. This means that the dimension of the problem is reduced by one and a re-zoning process for the internal nodal points is not necessary. Additionally, we have a higher sensitivity of displacement and stress fields to geometrical disturbances. These advantagas make the BE method more attractive for shape optimization than the FE method, especially when three-dimensional poblems are involved, see [5].

Country

Germany

Related Organizations

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Germany
Karlsruhe University of Education
Germany

Keywords

ddc:620, Engineering & allied operations, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620, 620

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average