
pmid: 1034550
Our present, still fragmentary knowledge of teratogens and teratogenesis is based on studies following two major methodologic lines, non-experimental, epidemiologic studies, and experimental, in vivo investigations. Both approaches are hampered by many limitations and shortcomings, the most obvious in the epidemiologic studies being the complicated study situation and the great number of confounding factors (Saxen, 1974), whereas the greatest difficulty in animal experiments is the inapplicability of the results to other species, including human embryos (Fraser, 1964). Hence, we need to explore alternative and complementary methods for testing various substances for teratogenicity and for studying the mechanisms of abnormal development. Tissue culture has now been used for decades in many fields of biomedical research and has proved a most valuable tool in the hands of skillful, critical scientists. In teratology, the method may also eliminate some of the difficulties and shortcomings of epidemiological and in vivo studies, but so far it has found only a limited number of applications in this field. Cell culture methods have recently become indispensable in diagnostic teratology but their use in basic studies is difficult. Here organ culture, which allows good differentiation, morphogenesis, and often functional maturation of embryonic tissues in vitro, might prove more useful.
Hydrocortisone, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Mice, Inbred Strains, Chick Embryo, Tetracycline, Bone and Bones, Congenital Abnormalities, Cleft Palate, Mice, Organ Culture Techniques, Pregnancy, Animals, Female, Rubella virus
Hydrocortisone, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Mice, Inbred Strains, Chick Embryo, Tetracycline, Bone and Bones, Congenital Abnormalities, Cleft Palate, Mice, Organ Culture Techniques, Pregnancy, Animals, Female, Rubella virus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
