
Animal models have proved to be of considerable importance in elucidating mechanisms underlying joint damage in osteoarthritis (OA) and providing proof of concept in the development of pharmacologic and biologic agents that may modify structural damage in the OA joint. The utility of animal models in predicting the response to an intervention with a drug or biologic agent in humans, however, can be established only after evidence is obtained of a positive effect of the agent in humans. To date, no agent has been shown unequivocally to have such an effect, although diacerhein and glucosamine have recently been reported to lower the rate of loss of articular cartilage in patients with hip OA and knee OA, respectively, based on measurements of the rate of joint space narrowing in plain radiographs. Furthermore, the predominant manifestation of OA – and the feature that leads people with radiographic changes of the disease to decide to seek medical attention and contributes to the enormous medicoeconomic and socioeconomic burden imposed by the disease – is joint pain. Notably, none of the animal models of OA is a good indicator of the analgesic effects of pharmacologic agents. Indeed, it should not be assumed a priori that reduction in the rate of progression of joint damage in OA will be associated with a reduction in joint pain.
Cartilage, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Arthralgia, Bone and Bones, Disease Models, Animal, Dogs, Osteoarthritis, Animals, Humans, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Muscle, Skeletal
Cartilage, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Arthralgia, Bone and Bones, Disease Models, Animal, Dogs, Osteoarthritis, Animals, Humans, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Muscle, Skeletal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
