
pmid: 10339740
Epigenetic programming is most likely the least understood part of the control of gene expression and too broad a subject to consider in a single chapter. The difficulty in studying its role in gene expression is that very few Mendelian mutations cause arrest in epigenetic programming and that chromatin changes occurring many cell divisions before transcription starts are difficult to monitor by biochemical means (Lund et al. 1995a). Given this complexity, we shall focus here on one example of epigenetic programming that has already been genetically exploited: parental genomic imprinting. One of the major advantages of studying plant versus animal development is based on the generation of alleles of genes affected in epigenetic programming so that biochemical methods can be applied by comparing tissues of different genetic origin. Here, we consider allelic variations and mutations that specifically focus on epigenetic programming at the gamete level.
Genomic Imprinting, Magnoliopsida, Ploidies, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Zein, Genes, Regulator, Arabidopsis, Zea mays
Genomic Imprinting, Magnoliopsida, Ploidies, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Zein, Genes, Regulator, Arabidopsis, Zea mays
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
