
Animal assays represent an important stage between in vitro studies and human clinical applications. These models are crucial for biomedical research and regenerative medicine studies, as these offer precious information for systematically assessing the efficacy and risks of recently created biomaterials, medical devices, drugs, and therapeutic modalities prior to initiation of human clinical trials. Therefore, selecting a suitable experimental model for tissue engineering purposes is essential to establish valid conclusions. However, it remains important to be conscious of the advantages and limitations of the various small and large animal models frequently used for biomedical research as well as the different challenges encountered in extrapolating data obtained from animal studies and the risks of misinterpretation. This chapter discusses the various small animal model strategies used for osteochondral defect repair. Particular emphasis will be placed on analyzing the materials and strategies used in each model.
Guinea Pigs, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Biocompatible Materials, Stem cells, Biomaterials, Mice, Implants, Experimental, Species Specificity, Small animal models, Materials Testing, Animals, Humans, Osteochondral regeneration strategies, Scaffolds, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Rats, Models, Animal, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Rabbits, Bone Diseases, Growth factors, Cartilage Diseases, Stem Cell Transplantation
Guinea Pigs, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Biocompatible Materials, Stem cells, Biomaterials, Mice, Implants, Experimental, Species Specificity, Small animal models, Materials Testing, Animals, Humans, Osteochondral regeneration strategies, Scaffolds, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Rats, Models, Animal, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Rabbits, Bone Diseases, Growth factors, Cartilage Diseases, Stem Cell Transplantation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
