
Given a sufficiently large population satisfying certain statistical regularities, we show that it is often possible to accurately estimate the utilitarian social welfare function and identify the welfare-maximizing social alternative, even if we only have very noisy data about individual utility functions and interpersonal utility comparisons, and even if the individuals can be strategically dishonest.
utilitarian; interpersonal comparisons; Groves-Clarke pivotal mecha- nism., [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, utilitarian; relative utilitarian; approval voting; Borda; scoring rule; Condorcet., jel: jel:D70, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:D60, jel: jel:D71
utilitarian; interpersonal comparisons; Groves-Clarke pivotal mecha- nism., [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, utilitarian; relative utilitarian; approval voting; Borda; scoring rule; Condorcet., jel: jel:D70, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:D60, jel: jel:D71
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
