Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Volatile Composition of Artemisia amygdalina

Authors: Shabir H. Lone; Khursheed Ahmad Bhat; Mohammad Akbar Khuroo;

Volatile Composition of Artemisia amygdalina

Abstract

This chapter deals with the analysis of mono and sesquiterpenoid composition in the leaves and stem of Artemisia amygdalina Decne obtained by hydrodistillation using a combination of capillary GC-FID and GC-MS analytical techniques. A total of 25 components in the leaf and 32 components in the stem essential oils have been reported. The leaf essential oil majorly consists of monoterpene hydrocarbons (38.2 %) and oxygenated monoterpenes (43.8 %) together constituting 82.0 % of the total oil composition. The principal components that have been identified include sabinene (10.2 %), p-cymene (14.7 %), 1,8-cineole (17.5 %), and borneol (19.8 %). The stem essential oil comprises monoterpene hydrocarbons (66.1 %), oxygenated monoterpenes (12.8 %) and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (11.2 %). The major constituents were α-pinene (6.0 %), camphene (10.4 %), β-pinene (40.2 %), and borneol (5.7 %). A comparative analysis of the essential oil obtained from the leaves of micropropagated plants of A. amygdalina with that of the leaves of field grown parent plants has also been reported. The oil yield from the micropropagated plants has been found to be (0.05 % v/w) than the oil yield obtained from field-grown plants (0.2 % v/w). The major constituents of the field-grown plants include p-cymene (21.0 %), 1,8-cineole (24.9 %), α-terpineol (5.9 %), β-caryophyllene (4.7 %), germacrene-D (4.0 %), while as the major constituents of the micropropagated plants reported include p-cymene (11.3 %), 1,8-cineole (10.2 %), borneol (7.9 %), α-longipinene (5.5 %), α-copaene (5.5 %) and β-caryophyllene (17 %). The essential oil from field-grown plant is further dominated by the presence of oxygenated monoterpenes (41.5 %), monoterpene hydrocarbons (35.9 %) and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (16.3 %) while as the essential oil of micropropagated plants is known to be characterized by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (40.0 %), oxygenated monoterpenes (25.2 %) and monoterpene hydrocarbons (21.6 %).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!