
Since 2020, many policies and studies have highlighted a significant funding gap for climate adaptation and mitigation in agriculture. This chapter examines how different actors frame the finance-agriculture-climate nexus and the public instruments proposed to address funding shortages. It reviews recent efforts to mobilize climate finance, focusing on innovative public-private financial tools and repurposing existing public funds toward “sustainable” agriculture. The financialization of agricultural climate policies emphasizes risk-return dimensions, shaping both the volume and the flows of funding. This often limits support for climate-vulnerable groups and countries.
[SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
[SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
