
In the scope of this paper, we engage with the orientational discipline Integrative Bioethics, supplemented with pluriperspectivity’s (Čović 2018), inter- and trans-disciplinarity methodological postulates, to provide a unique platform for the interdisciplinary integration between perspectives (Jurić 2018) of philosophy (phenomenology) and (bio)ethics. We place particular emphasis on their mutual hermeneutical potentiality, with a high degree of benefits and improvements in the context of understanding life as the first step for its protection, synthetically bridging bios-psyche-episteme. To strengthen our arguments and aims, we will turn to the integrative bioethics of psyche as a fruitful research field to prove our thesis in which Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Thomas Fuchs, among others, will be teleologically analogized within the scope of the discipline.
Integrative philosophy of life, Transdisciplinarity, Integrative bioethics, Embodied intersubjectivity, Existential phenomenology of life, Lifeworld, Orientational knowledge, Leib
Integrative philosophy of life, Transdisciplinarity, Integrative bioethics, Embodied intersubjectivity, Existential phenomenology of life, Lifeworld, Orientational knowledge, Leib
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
