
The superheat degree in the process of aluminium electrolysis is an important indicator for judging the condition of the electrolysis cell. In the actual production process, the artificial observation of the fire hole is usually used for judgment and decision of cell condition. However, the decreasing number and frequent flow of experienced technicians make it difficult to guarantee the accuracy of this complex work. Although there exist some methods for state identification of superheat degree, they do not consider flame interference, resulting in decreasing of accuracy. In view of this fact, a method for state identification of superheat degree with flame interference is proposed, and the proposed method is compared with the existing method on 17 aluminium electrolysis cells. The vilification result shows that the proposed method has a better performance than the existing methods. Moreover, it reveals that the proposed method is feasible for identification with flame interference. In addition, it can provide suggestions for the technicians to judge the state of superheat degree.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
