
This paper presents a comparative study between a method for fuzzy clustering which retrieves pure individual types from data, the fuzzy clustering with proportional membership (FCPM), and an archetypal analysis algorithm based on Furthest-Sum approach (FS-AA). A simulation study comprising 82 data sets is conducted with a proper data generator, FCPM-DG, whose goal is twofold: first, to analyse the ability of archetypal clustering algorithm to recover Archetypes from data of distinct dimensionality; second, to analyse robustness of FCPM and FS-AA algorithms to outliers. The effectiveness of these algorithms are yet compared on clustering 12 diverse benchmark data sets from machine learning. The evaluation conducted with five primer unsupervised validation indices shows the good quality of the clustering solutions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
