<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Modern array technologies allow for the simultaneous screening of virtually all human genes on the DNA and RNA level. Studies using such techniques have lead to the identification of hundreds of genes with a potential role in cancer or other diseases. The validation of all of these candidate genes requires in situ analysis of high numbers of clinical tissues samples. The tissue microarray (TMA) technology greatly facilitates such analysis. In this method, minute tissue samples (0.6 mm in diameter) from up to 1,000 different tissues can be analyzed on one microscope glass slide. All in situ methods suitable for histological studies can be applied to TMAs without major changes of protocols, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or RNA in situ hybridization. Because all tissues are analyzed simultaneously with the same batch of reagents, TMA studies provide an unprecedented degree of standardization, speed, and cost efficiency.
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Tissue Array Analysis, Biopsy, Neoplasms, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Molecular Probe Techniques, Microarray Analysis, Immunohistochemistry, Molecular Biology, In Situ Hybridization, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, High-Throughput Screening Assays
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Tissue Array Analysis, Biopsy, Neoplasms, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Molecular Probe Techniques, Microarray Analysis, Immunohistochemistry, Molecular Biology, In Situ Hybridization, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, High-Throughput Screening Assays
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 81 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |