
Attention has been studied from a variety of different theoretical and scientific perspectives ranging from the examination of cellular mechanisms such as the graded potentials of single neurons to the complex systems encompassing multiple brain regions underlying consciousness. While historically quite a diverse set of behavioral phenomena have been investigated under the rubric of attention and many different methodological approaches employed, there has been considerable convergence of concepts regarding the nature of attention and the processes that underlie it. In the first edition of this book, a theoretical framework was proposed that specified four core elements of attention, each comprised of interrelated component processes [1]. To a large extent, the elements of this model have proven to be consistent with those put forth in other models of attention over the past 2 decades. In this chapter, the elements of this framework are reviewed from the perspective of different scientific approaches to the study of attention, and evidence supporting their validity is discussed. This framework will be revisited and discussed in relationship to other models and theories of attention in Chap. 20.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
