
AbstractAny height system has two constituents: A reference surface upon which all heights are equal to zero, and a prescription for how observed heights and height differences will be related to that surface. That prescription is typically formulated with reference to Earth’s gravity field, but in this contribution, we will use the concept of metric spaces instead. In most height systems, the height of a point can be interpreted as the length of the 3-dimensional path from a point of interest to the reference surface in a particular metric space. The geometry of the path is that of the space associated with the height system. This submission explores the definition of a height system simply as a metric space and a reference surface, applies it to common height systems used in geodesy (geodetic, orthometric, dynamic, normal), and examines their characteristics through that lens.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
