
doi: 10.1007/11752707_10
handle: 1942/1722
The number of haptic algorithms has been growing over the past few years. However, little research has been performed in evaluating these algorithms. This paper provides both a theoretical framework and a practical discussion of how the correctness and performance of force-feedback algorithms can be verified. The practical discussion is necessary as the theoretical framework proves that an infinite number of cases should be considered when evaluating a haptic algorithm. However, using statistical techniques, this evaluation can be performed within a reasonable frame of time. The evaluation method in this paper has itself been validated by evaluating two algorithms. From this test, we can conclude that the evaluation method is a reliable method for verifying if haptic algorithms are correct.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
